<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Created to Be His Helpmeet</title>
	<link>http://mindy.firstimportance.com/2005/10/21/created-to-be-his-helpmeet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Contradictory Ben</title>
		<link>http://mindy.firstimportance.com/2005/10/21/created-to-be-his-helpmeet/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Contradictory Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mindy.firstimportance.com/2005/10/21/created-to-be-his-helpmeet/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Just passing through, and couldn't resist noting that the usage of &lt;em&gt;'ezer&lt;/em&gt;, the Hebrew word your Bible translates as helpmeet, provides no support for the idea that Eve was created to help Adam do &lt;em&gt;whatever&lt;/em&gt; he wanted to do: she is a help not a servant. Sometimes in order to help someone is necessary to go against their orders and their desires. It is used again in Exodus 18:4, Deuteronomy 33:7, Deuteronomy 33:29, and Psalms 33:20, 70:5, 115:9-11, 121:1-2, 124:8 to refer not to wives but to God. Does the God described in the Bible help human beings to do whatever &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; wants to do, or does He actually do what's best for them? The verse usually (though not necessarily accurately) used to justify the subjection of wives to husbands is Genesis 3:16. This may well specifically refer, as apparently certain medieval Jewish commentators believed, to the sphere of sexual desire. (See Carol Myers, &lt;em&gt;Discovering Eve: Ancient Israelite Women in Context&lt;/em&gt; (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), especially pp. 109-17.) But in any case if Adam’s alleged subjugation of Eve was a punishment for Eve’s part in the Fall, then (if we interpret the text consistently) it can not also have been implied in &lt;em&gt;'ezer&lt;/em&gt;, which describes Eve’s position before the Fall.

(Please note: I mean no offence. I’m also a reader, not a believer, so I'm sure you'll think about it for yourself.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just passing through, and couldn&#8217;t resist noting that the usage of <em>&#8216;ezer</em>, the Hebrew word your Bible translates as helpmeet, provides no support for the idea that Eve was created to help Adam do <em>whatever</em> he wanted to do: she is a help not a servant. Sometimes in order to help someone is necessary to go against their orders and their desires. It is used again in Exodus 18:4, Deuteronomy 33:7, Deuteronomy 33:29, and Psalms 33:20, 70:5, 115:9-11, 121:1-2, 124:8 to refer not to wives but to God. Does the God described in the Bible help human beings to do whatever <em>they</em> wants to do, or does He actually do what&#8217;s best for them? The verse usually (though not necessarily accurately) used to justify the subjection of wives to husbands is Genesis 3:16. This may well specifically refer, as apparently certain medieval Jewish commentators believed, to the sphere of sexual desire. (See Carol Myers, <em>Discovering Eve: Ancient Israelite Women in Context</em> (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), especially pp. 109-17.) But in any case if Adam’s alleged subjugation of Eve was a punishment for Eve’s part in the Fall, then (if we interpret the text consistently) it can not also have been implied in <em>&#8216;ezer</em>, which describes Eve’s position before the Fall.</p>
<p>(Please note: I mean no offence. I’m also a reader, not a believer, so I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll think about it for yourself.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
